Court of Appeals of Maryland· 6/13/2005
In Re Billy W.
Citations
- 875 A.2d 734
- 387 Md. 405
- 2005 Md. LEXIS 314
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, where the Rules of Evidence were not strictly applied, the trial judge “must evaluate whether evidence proffered for admission is sufficiently reliable and probative prior to its admission”
- concluding that “in permanency planning hearings when the Rules of Evidence are not strictly applied, the trial court must evaluate whether evidence proffered for admission is sufficiently reliable and probative prior to its admission”
- discussing the “traditional role” for guardians ad litem in custody cases as the duty to determine the child’s best interests, make a recommendation to the court on that basis, and testify at the custody hearing
- orders eliminating parent’s unsupervised visitation with children and requiring parent to secure services of off-duty police officer to supervise visits were changes to the parent’s detriment and thus were immediately appealable
- order maintaining permanency plan but changing visitation structure to parents’ detriment immediately appealable
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Battaglia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- A.D.B.H. v. Houston County Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2008-03-21· cited 26×
- In Re Joseph N.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-02-19· cited 20×
- In Re Damien F.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-10-07· cited 14×
- Wells v. WellsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-04-13· cited 12×
- In re Cody H.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2017-03-24· cited 11×
- Tutein v. ArteagaSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2014-04-07· cited 11×
- Bartlett v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2014-05-19· cited 9×
- In re: J.J. and T.S.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-12-21· cited 5×
- In Re VICTORIA C.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2014-03-27· cited 4×
- Juliano v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-01-27· cited 3×
- In Re Shirley B.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-04-27· cited 3×
- Tarachanskaya v. VolodarskyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-05-02· cited 1×
- In Re ANDRE J.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-06-01· cited 1×
- In Re A.N., B.N., and V.N.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-12-16· cited 1×
- In Re Faith H.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-07-22
- In re: K.Y.B.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-08-30
- In re: K.L.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2021-09-01
- In re: G.T.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2021-05-26
- In re: X.R., X.R., K.D.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2022-05-02
- In re: I.Q.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2025-01-03
Cites
57 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re Autumn H.California Court of Appeal· 1994-08-08· cited 1,005×
- In Re D.F.Illinois Supreme Court· 2002-09-19· cited 291×
- In Re Yve S.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-03-27· cited 139×
- In Re Mark M.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-10-05· cited 96×
- Whittlesey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-09-28· cited 96×
- Town of Somerset v. Montgomery County Board of AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1966-12-16· cited 94×
- Woods v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-04-10· cited 66×
- State v. DopkowskiCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-03-11· cited 49×
- Arkansas Department of Human Services v. CollierSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2003-01-23· cited 44×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-11-28· cited 41×
- In the Interest of N.M.Supreme Court of Iowa· 1995-02-22· cited 38×
- Padilla v. NORFOLK DIVISION OF SOCIAL SERVICES.Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1996-07-09· cited 37×
- In Re Samone H.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-02-09· cited 37×
- Goldberg v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-11-08· cited 37×
- In the Interest of T.H., a ChildTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2004-03-09· cited 36×
- In Re Billy W.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-05-11· cited 34×
- Baker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-11-12· cited 33×
- In Re Damon M.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-01-12· cited 32×
- Fresno County Department of Children & Family Sevices v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2004-09-21· cited 32×
- Raible v. RaibleCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1966-05-27· cited 29×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.