Skip to main content
· 12/16/1966

Town of Somerset v. Montgomery County Board of Appeals

Citations

  • 225 A.2d 294
  • 245 Md. 52
  • 1966 Md. LEXIS 399

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a timely filed petition in which all parties were listed would not be dismissed simply because the petition failed to explicitly allege that the parties were aggrieved by the agency decision
  • holding that a timely filed petition in which all parties were listed would not be dismissed simply because the petition failed to explicitly allege that the parties were aggrieved by the agency decision
  • distinguishing between “the merits of the substantive issues decided by the Board” and whether “the appellants have the requisite standing to have those issues reviewed”
  • \there is no requirement that actual prejudice be shown before denial of due process can be established\
  • a case wherein present counsel for appellants persuaded us that his client by such action had been denied due process
  • denial of cross-examination prevents showing of prejudice based on what cross-examination could have established

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hammond, Horney, Oppenheimer, Barnes, Finan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.