· 12/16/1966
Town of Somerset v. Montgomery County Board of Appeals
Citations
- 225 A.2d 294
- 245 Md. 52
- 1966 Md. LEXIS 399
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a timely filed petition in which all parties were listed would not be dismissed simply because the petition failed to explicitly allege that the parties were aggrieved by the agency decision
- holding that a timely filed petition in which all parties were listed would not be dismissed simply because the petition failed to explicitly allege that the parties were aggrieved by the agency decision
- distinguishing between “the merits of the substantive issues decided by the Board” and whether “the appellants have the requisite standing to have those issues reviewed”
- \there is no requirement that actual prejudice be shown before denial of due process can be established\
- a case wherein present counsel for appellants persuaded us that his client by such action had been denied due process
- denial of cross-examination prevents showing of prejudice based on what cross-examination could have established
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hammond, Horney, Oppenheimer, Barnes, Finan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.