In Re Bell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• addressing attorney’s argument that ARDC Hearing and Review Boards denied him due process without conducting separate evidentiary hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Chandler
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1994-08-04· cited 25×
• Department of Corrections Ex Rel. People v. Adams
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-04-23· cited 20×
• Podolsky and Associates LP v. Discipio
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-06-30· cited 17×
• In Re Howard
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1999-12-02· cited 17×
• In Re Ingersoll
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1999-03-18· cited 4×
• Podolsky & Associates v. Discipio
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-06-30

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Weaver v. Graham
  Supreme Court· 1981-02-24· cited 2,482×
• Niven v. Siqueira
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1985-11-21· cited 181×
• In Re Mitan
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1979-01-12· cited 63×
• In Re Taylor
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1977-05-20· cited 57×
• In Re Stillo
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1977-10-05· cited 40×
• In Re Yamaguchi
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1987-11-16· cited 32×
• In Re LaPinska
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1978-10-06· cited 31×
• In Re Weston
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1982-10-22· cited 24×
• In Re March
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1978-04-03· cited 23×
• In Re Samuels
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1989-02-02· cited 16×
• In Re Joyce
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1989-10-25· cited 16×
• In Re Levin
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1987-09-21· cited 14×
• In Re Lunardi
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1989-03-29· cited 4×
• In Re Trezise
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1987-10-05· cited 3×
• In re Ciardelli
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1987-10-05· cited 1×
• In re Behnke
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1989-03-22· cited 1×