Podolsky and Associates LP v. Discipio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the invitation to adopt Rule 608(b), by noting, inter alia, that, “[i]n Illinois[,] a witness’s credibility may not be impeached by inquiry into specific acts of misconduct”
• \In Illinois a witness's credibility may not be impeached by inquiry into specific acts of misconduct which have not led to a criminal conviction\
• “In Illinois a witness’s credibility may not be impeached by inquiry into specific acts of misconduct which have not led to a criminal conviction”
• “In Illinois a witness’s credibility may not be impeached by inquiry into specific acts of misconduct which have not led to a criminal conviction”
• “In Illinois a witness’s credibility may not be impeached by inquiry into specific acts of misconduct which have not led to a criminal conviction.”
• “In determining whether a crime involves dishonesty or false statement under *** the Montgomery test, only the provision which the defendant is found to have violated is to be considered; the circumstances of the defendant’s commission of the violation are not relevant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).