In re B.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defining “custodian” as one who has “the legal obligation to insure the children’s welfare”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• In re E.H.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1998-10-01· cited 38×
• Appeal of A.H.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-04-23· cited 24×
• In re T.G.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-11-14· cited 16×
• In re D.S.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-09-20· cited 16×
• In re A.H.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-02-26· cited 15×
• In re J.W.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2003-12-04· cited 14×
• In re L.J.T.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-05-22· cited 13×
• In re A.S.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-06-09· cited 11×
• In re N.P.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-09-08· cited 8×
• In re AM. V.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2003-10-10· cited 5×
• In re C.C.J.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2001-07-26· cited 4×
• In re K.J.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-01-13· cited 3×
• In Re NP
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-09-08· cited 1×
• Matter of As
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-06-09· cited 1×
• In re V.K.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-11-02· cited 1×
• In Re AH
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-02-26
• In Re LJT
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-05-22
• In Re EH
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1998-10-01
• In Re JW
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2003-12-04
• In Re BC
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-12-07

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In re N. M. S.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1975-12-08· cited 33×
• Martin v. Tate
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-05-13· cited 25×
• In re L.E.J.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-08-02· cited 14×