In re K.J.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding incarcerated mother neglected child under § 16-2301(9)(A)(iv) when she did not make any arrangements for child after grandmother’s words and conduct indicated intention to discontinue care
• upholding neglect finding under (9)(A)(iv) where mother “did not make any arrangements for K.J. during the thirty- day CFSA investigation” which followed the discontinuation of grandmother’s care
• mother was unable to care for child while incarcerated and did not arrange care for child within thirty days of grandmother discontinuing care
• “As we have determined the mother neglected K.J. under the standard as set forth in D.C. Code § 16-2301 (9)(A)(iv) we need not reach a discussion relating to D.C. Code § 16-2301 (9)(A)(ii).”
• grandmother told child “she could not come back to her home”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Campbell v. Fort Lincoln New Town Corp.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-10-04· cited 8×
• Bridges v. Clark
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2013-01-24· cited 6×
• In re Z.M.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2022-04-14

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In re S.G.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-10-26· cited 126×
• Fuller v. Fuller
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1968-11-12· cited 60×
• In Re Ty. B.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-07-21· cited 36×
• Brooks v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-11-15· cited 36×
• Brown v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-01-08· cited 32×
• Cooley v. Washington
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1957-11-25· cited 23×
• In re B.C.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-12-07· cited 23×
• In re S.L.E.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-06-06· cited 13×
• In re T.T.C.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-08-05· cited 4×