In re N. M. S.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We favor an interpretation of a statute that furthers and does not obstruct the statute’s purpose.” (citing Burns v. Stone Forest Indus., 147 F.3d 1182, 1184 (9th Cir. 1998))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).