In re B.B.

Citations

• 2020 Ohio 4007

Syllabus

The juvenile court did not err by denying appellant's motion for contempt against appellee wherein appellant claimed appellee had denied him the opportunity to have telephone communication with their daughter while the child was in appellee's care as appellee was justified in blocking appellant's phone number after appellant called appellee 16 times that day having already received a domestic violence civil protection order against appellant for telephone harassment. The juvenile court also did not err by sua sponte removing a provision in its parenting time order requiring the parties to give each other opportunity to have telephone communication with their daughter when the child was in their care as that provision was not in the best interest of the child given the considerable conflict and argument when appellant and appellee are on the phone together while in the presence of the child.