In re Z.N.T.

Citations

• 2019 Ohio 915

Syllabus

The juvenile court erred in finding that Civ.R. 52 did not apply to the court's exercise of its child custody jurisdiction. Father did not waive his right to challenge a shared parenting plan provision removing the juvenile court's continuing jurisdiction over child custody and visitation when he acquiesced to the original shared parenting plan and failed to object to a magistrate's decision denying a motion for lack of jurisdiction where the provision is against public policy and unenforceable.