In re Ballard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the procedures afforded in contested matters provide all the process that is due”
• noting that there are no differences between the permissible methods of service used to initiate adversary proceedings and contested matters
• noting that there are no differences between the permissible methods of service used to initiate adversary proceedings and contested matters
• finding that damages for a stay violation may be pursued as a contested matter or through an adversary proceeding
• explaining that claims asserting violations of the automatic stay do not require an adversary proceeding under Rule 7001
• “There are two different types of litigated proceedings within bankruptcy cases: adversary proceedings and contested matters.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Sori
  N.D. Illinois· 2014-07-29· cited 5×
• Louviere v. Thompson (In re Thompson)
  S.D. Texas· 2017-06-20· cited 4×

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• In Re John H. Gledhill and Gloria K. Gledhill, Debtors, State Bank of Southern Utah v. John H. Gledhill and Gloria K. Gledhill
  Tenth Circuit· 1996-02-02· cited 121×
• In the Matter of Thomas J. Perkins, Jr., Debtor-Appellant, and Appeal of Teachers' Retirement System of the State of Illinois, Intervening
  Seventh Circuit· 1990-05-22· cited 116×
• David ARCHER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MACOMB COUNTY BANK, Defendant-Appellant
  Sixth Circuit· 1988-08-11· cited 112×
• Barrientos v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
  Ninth Circuit· 2011-02-10· cited 66×
• In Re Cannonsburg Environmental Associates, Ltd., Debtor. Tully Construction Company, Inc. v. Cannonsburg Environmental Associates, Ltd.
  Sixth Circuit· 1996-01-10· cited 53×
• Hoogerheide v. Internal Revenue Service
  Sixth Circuit· 2011-04-12· cited 43×
• In Re Copper King Inn, Inc., Debtor. Trust Corporation of Montana v. Robert Patterson, John Noonan, James McDermand Donald Johnson, and Arthur West
  Ninth Circuit· 1990-11-07· cited 41×
• In Re Timbs
  E.D. Tennessee· 1994-06-22· cited 40×
• Horton v. Beaumont Place Homeowners Ass'n (In Re Horton)
  D. Colorado· 1987-04-03· cited 37×
• Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Meadows (In Re Meadows)
  Sixth Circuit· 2008-11-12· cited 36×
• In Re Skeen
  E.D. Tennessee· 2000-05-05· cited 29×
• In Re Depew
  E.D. Tennessee· 1985-07-17· cited 29×
• In Re Butcher
  Sixth Circuit· 1985-06-07· cited 27×
• Vogt v. Dynamic Recovery Services (In Re Vogt)
  D. Colorado· 2000-12-06· cited 27×
• Commercial Credit Corp. v. Reed
  E.D. Texas· 1993-04-29· cited 26×
• Fortune & Faal v. Zumbrun (In Re Zumbrun)
  Ninth Circuit· 1988-07-19· cited 26×
• Annese v. Kolenda (In Re Kolenda)
  W.D. Michigan· 1997-08-18· cited 25×
• Rogers v. B-Real, L.L.C. (In Re Rogers)
  M.D. Louisiana· 2008-07-21· cited 19×
• Patton v. Shade
  C.D. Illinois· 2001-01-22· cited 16×
• In Re LTV Steel Co., Inc.
  N.D. Ohio· 2001-07-02· cited 16×