Vogt v. Dynamic Recovery Services (In Re Vogt)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• false 7 credit reporting, if not done to extract payment of the debt, is 8 not an act proscribed by the Code
• “[T]he Defendant [cannot] be faulted, under section 524, for refusing to correct this [credit] report.”
• “False reporting, if not done to extract payment of the debt, is simply not an act proscribed by the Code. There is absolutely no showing in this case that the Defendant had manufactured a false report in order to extract payment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).