· 7/19/1988
Fortune & Faal v. Zumbrun (In Re Zumbrun)
Citations
- 88 B.R. 250
- 1988 Bankr. LEXIS 1378
- 18 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 122
- 1988 WL 85688
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- same due process and service requirements are applicable to both bankruptcy rules 7004 and 9014
- attorney sanctioned for postpetition filing of state court lawsuit on behalf of client in violation of stay
- “the same due process requirements are applicable to both Bankruptcy Rules 7004 and 9014”
- “[I]t is recognized that such a proceeding is a core proceeding because the automatic stay is a ‘creature peculiar to federal bankruptcy law’ and it ‘plays a fundamental role in the administration of the Bankruptcy Code.’”
- “[I]t is recognized that such a proceeding is a core proceeding because the automatic stay is a ‘creature peculiar to federal bankruptcy law’ and it ‘plays a fundamental role in the administration of the Bankruptcy Code.’ ” (citations omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mooreman, Yolinn, Jones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.