Skip to main content
· 7/19/1988

Fortune & Faal v. Zumbrun (In Re Zumbrun)

Citations

  • 88 B.R. 250
  • 1988 Bankr. LEXIS 1378
  • 18 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 122
  • 1988 WL 85688

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • same due process and service requirements are applicable to both bankruptcy rules 7004 and 9014
  • attorney sanctioned for postpetition filing of state court lawsuit on behalf of client in violation of stay
  • “the same due process requirements are applicable to both Bankruptcy Rules 7004 and 9014”
  • “[I]t is recognized that such a proceeding is a core proceeding because the automatic stay is a ‘creature peculiar to federal bankruptcy law’ and it ‘plays a fundamental role in the administration of the Bankruptcy Code.’”
  • “[I]t is recognized that such a proceeding is a core proceeding because the automatic stay is a ‘creature peculiar to federal bankruptcy law’ and it ‘plays a fundamental role in the administration of the Bankruptcy Code.’ ” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mooreman, Yolinn, Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.