Skip to main content

In re A.R.

Citations

  • 2017 Ohio 8058

Syllabus

Probation admission, due process, ineffective assistance of counsel. The juvenile court erred in failing to inform the juvenile appellant of the consequences of his admission in accordance with Juv.R. 29(D). The juvenile court also failed to follow the requirements of Juv.R. 35 by sentencing the appellant on cases that the state did not file a motion to invoke the continuing jurisdiction of the court. In addition, the appellant did not receive effective assistance of counsel because his counsel did not object to the juvenile court's failure to comply with Juv.R. 35.

Judges: Laster Mays

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.