Skip to main content
N.D. California· 4/22/2019

In re Apple Inc.

Citations

  • 386 F. Supp. 3d 1155

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deferring choice of law determination until later stage of litigation given 9 that “the record and the parties’ briefing are inadequate at this stage”
  • finding a Computer Fraud and Abuse Act claim not barred by 5 the economic loss rule
  • addressing (c)(4) and (c)(5) and allegations of device impairment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davila

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.