Skip to main content
· 12/1/1999

Charles E. McDowell Jr. v. Arthur Calderon, Warden

Citations

  • 197 F.3d 1253
  • 99 Daily Journal DAR 12100
  • 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9363
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 32019
  • 1999 WL 1101288

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that under unusual circumstances an amendment outside the listed situations may be appropriate
  • noting that a reconsideration motion 2 “should not be granted, absent highly unusual circumstances”
  • finding no clear error in a district court order resolving a “debatable” question
  • “[R]econsideration of a judgment 14 after its entry is an extraordinary remedy which should be used sparingly.”
  • “When, on the other hand, we review a district court’s refusal to modify a protective order on the ground of changed circumstances, the legal basis for the original order is not at issue.”
  • “[W]e disapprove [of] any suggestion ... that a refusal to reconsider is an abuse of discretion merely because the underlying order is erroneous, rather than clearly erroneous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hug, Browning, Pregerson, Brunetti, Kozinski, Rymer, Nelson, Kleinfeld, Tashima, Silverman, Graber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.