In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas 04-124-03 & 04-124-05

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the movant could not be criticized for failing to provide a privilege log before he had an opportunity to review the records
• explaining that “[t]he privilege protecting confidential communications between an attorney and his client dates back to the Tudor dynasty”
• explaining that “[t]he privilege protecting confidential communications between an attorney and his client dates back to the Tudor dynasty”
• stating that the risk of accidental disclosure of privileged materials to prosecutors is a paramount concern when dealing with privileged materials among the property seized
• stating that the risk of accidental disclosure of privileged materials to prosecutors is a paramount concern when dealing with privileged materials among the property seized
• stating that the movant could not be criticized for failing to provide a privilege log before he had an opportunity to review the records

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).