D. Connecticut· 2/1/1999
In Re Altman
Citations
- 230 B.R. 6
- 1999 Bankr. LEXIS 76
- 1999 WL 42258
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, following Grogan v. Garner, the appropriate standard of proof for appointment of a Chapter 11 trustee is preponderance of the evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alan H.W. Shiff
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Tradex Corp. v. MorseD. Massachusetts· 2006-03-31· cited 20×
- Keeley & Grabanski Land Partnership v. Keeley (In Re Keeley & Grabanski Land Partnership)Eighth Circuit· 2011-09-06· cited 11×
- Carroll v. Rafael Galleries, Inc. (In Re Altman)D. Connecticut· 2000-07-27· cited 9×
- Nisselson v. Carroll (In Re Altman)D. Connecticut· 2003-12-04· cited 5×
- United Statesha Soha Terrace, LLC. v. RGS Holding, LLC (In re Futterman)S.D. New York· 2018-05-09· cited 5×
- In Re AltmanD. Connecticut· 1999-02-16· cited 4×
- Prin Corp. v. Altman (In Re Altman)D. Connecticut· 2001-08-16· cited 3×
- Willcox v. Stroup (In Re Willcox)D. South Carolina· 2005-08-15· cited 2×
- Blackwell v. Rio Management, Inc. (In Re Blackwell for the Estate of I.G. Services Ltd.)W.D. Texas· 2001-06-21· cited 2×
- Prin Corp. v. Altman (In Re Altman)D. Connecticut· 2000-05-19· cited 1×
- Keeley & Grabanski Land Part. v. John KeeleyEighth Circuit· 2011-09-06
Cites
32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court· 1991-01-15· cited 5,972×
- Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1979-02-21· cited 3,653×
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-04-30· cited 2,137×
- United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Supreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 1,643×
- Morris v. New York State Department of Taxation & FinanceNew York Court of Appeals· 1993-10-19· cited 862×
- Barnhill v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1992-03-25· cited 682×
- In Re Prudential Lines Inc.Second Circuit· 1991-03-20· cited 115×
- Nof v. Gannon (In Re Gannon)S.D. New York· 1994-10-19· cited 67×
- In Re Ionosphere Clubs, Inc.S.D. New York· 1990-04-19· cited 57×
- Cristallina S. A. v. Christie, Manson & Woods International, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1986-05-13· cited 55×
- United States v. Luis E. Garcia-DuarteSecond Circuit· 1983-09-21· cited 47×
- Cajun Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. v. Central Louisiana Electric Co.Fifth Circuit· 1995-11-21· cited 40×
- In Re General Oil Distributors, Inc.E.D. New York· 1984-07-27· cited 29×
- State v. EastonNew York Supreme Court· 1995-06-28· cited 27×
- Altchek v. Altchek (In Re Altchek)S.D. New York· 1991-03-04· cited 22×
- Foxley v. Sotheby's Inc.S.D. New York· 1995-06-14· cited 20×
- In Re B.I. Financial Services Group, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1988-08-18· cited 19×
- Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors v. PSS Steamship Co. (In Re Prudential Lines Inc.)S.D. New York· 1990-09-27· cited 19×
- Pereira v. Goldberger (In Re Stephen Douglas, Ltd.)E.D. New York· 1994-11-14· cited 19×
- In Re Madison Management Group, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 1992-01-24· cited 18×
Other cases named In Re Altman
10 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- In Re AltmanD. Connecticut· 1999-02-16· cited 4×
- In re AltmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1994-04-19· cited 2×
- In re AltmanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-12-18· cited 2×
- In re AltmanIllinois Supreme Court· 1989-03-22· cited 1×
- In re AltmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1943-04-09
- In re AltmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1948-06-07
- In re AltmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1994-10-06
- In re AltmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2001-05-14
- In re AltmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2016-01-26
- In re AltmanSupreme Court of North Carolina· 1981-07-01
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.