Walat Farms, Inc. v. United States (In Re Walat Farms, Inc.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating Matthieson “did not deal with executory contracts in a Chapter 11 setting” and assuming the Matthieson court reached its conclusion because execu-tory contracts which are not timely assumed are deemed rejected and prepetition
• stating Matthieson \did not deal with executory contracts in a Chapter 11 setting\ and assuming the Matthieson court reached its conclusion because executory contracts which are not timely assumed are deemed rejected and prepetition
• stating Matthieson “did not deal with executory contracts in a Chapter 11 setting” and assuming the Matthieson court reached its conclusion because execu-tory contracts which are not timely assumed are deemed rejected and prepetition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).