Customs and Patent Appeals· 5/1/1975
In re Albrecht
Citations
- 514 F.2d 1389
- 185 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 585
- 1975 CCPA LEXIS 162
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reversing an obviousness rejection based on evidence of additional antiviral activity “totally dissimilar to any activity previously disclosed for prior art”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Almond
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re Diane M. DillonFederal Circuit· 1990-11-09· cited 74×
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2014-06-12· cited 52×
- In re MayCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1978-04-20· cited 43×
- Eli Lilly & Co. v. Premo Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Inc.Third Circuit· 1980-07-11· cited 37×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1980-07-11· cited 32×
- In re MerchantCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1978-05-11· cited 20×
- In re GreenfieldCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1978-03-16· cited 17×
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Allied Chemical Corp.S.D. New York· 1979-07-31· cited 9×
- In re AlbrechtCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1978-06-15· cited 9×
- In re AlbrechtCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1975-05-01· cited 7×
- In Re Diane M. DillonFederal Circuit· 1990-05-21· cited 5×
- In re RegelCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1975-12-18· cited 3×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Application of Viktor PapeschCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1963-03-20· cited 126×
- Application of Harold G. Petering and Harry H. FallCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1962-04-13· cited 89×
- Application of HenzeCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1950-04-03· cited 35×
- In re LintnerCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1972-05-04· cited 34×
- Commissioner of Patents v. Deutsche Gold-Und-Silber-Scheideanstalt Vormals RoesslerD.C. Circuit· 1968-05-08· cited 31×
- Application of Joseph R. Riden, Jr., and James P. FlavinCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1963-06-20· cited 29×
- Application of John R. StemniskiCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1971-10-07· cited 27×
- Application of Rene De Montmollin and Henri RiatCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1965-05-13· cited 25×
- Application of Alan B. HuellmantelCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1963-12-12· cited 24×
- Application of Paul E. HochCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1970-07-30· cited 23×
- In re MurchCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1972-08-24· cited 23×
- Application of John P. LambooyCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1962-04-13· cited 22×
- Application of Robert R. Mod, Evald L. Skau, Sara P. Fore, Frank C. Magne, Arthur F. Novak, Harold P. Dupuy, Jesse R. Ortego, and Mary J. FisherCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1969-04-10· cited 15×
- In re BlondelCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1974-06-27· cited 11×
- In re TaborskyCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1974-08-29· cited 8×
- In re AlbrechtCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1975-05-01· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.