In re Regel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining plaintiff brought a private action under both theories of common law fraud and violations of federal securities law
• finding it “irrelevant” that the owners of outdoor campsite lots “might have refused to rent out their campsite lots or rented the sites out themselves” because regardless, the success of the investment was “inextricably wedded to the success” of the overarching rental business
• \As a director without effective day-to-day control and without knowledge [the defendant] was not liable as a control person.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).