Skip to main content

In re A.L.

Citations

  • 779 A.2d 1172
  • 2001 Pa. Super. 192
  • 2001 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1311

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[t]he standard of review which this Court employs in cases of dependency is broad.”
  • following adjudication of dependency, child may not be removed from care of parent absent showing of clear necessity for removal, namely, where welfare of child requires it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cavanaugh, Stevens, Tamilia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named In re A.L.

74 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.