Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Michigan Court of Appeals· 4/18/2013

In re AJR

Citations

  • 300 Mich. App. 597
  • 834 N.W.2d 904
  • 2013 WL 1693962
  • 2013 Mich. App. LEXIS 722

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[I]f the Legislature wants to refer to something particular, not general, it uses the word ‘the,’ rather than ‘a’ or ‘an.’ ”
  • “[I]f the Legislature wants to refer to something particular, not general, it uses the word ‘the,’ rather than ‘a’ or ‘an.’”
  • “[I]f the Legislature wants to refer ,to something particular, not general, it uses the word ‘the,’ rather than ‘a’ or ‘an,’ ”
  • “[I]f the Legislature wants to refer to something particular, not general, it uses the word ‘the,’ rather than ‘a’ or ‘an.’ ”
  • “[T]his Court may not ignore the omission of a term from one section of a statute when that term is used in another section of the statute.”
  • “[T]his Court may not ignore the omission of a term from one section of a statute when that term is used in another section of the statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meter, Riordan, Wilder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.