Skip to main content

In Re HILL

Citations

  • 562 N.W.2d 254
  • 221 Mich. App. 683

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a petitioner only has to prove “that respondent had the ability to perform any one of the acts [under MCL 710.51(6)(b)] and substantially failed or neglected to do so for two or more years preceding the filing of the petition”
  • “In the present case, a support order was entered on October 7,1985. Therefore, it is only necessary to determine whether respondent had substantially complied with the support order for a period of two years or more before the filing of the petition [in 1995].”
  • interpreting virtually identical language in MCL 710.51(6)(b)
  • interpreting nearly identical language in MCL 710.51(6)(b)
  • interpreting nearly identical language in MCL 710.51(6)(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cavanagh, Reilly, Corwin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.