Skip to main content
· 11/18/1998

B P 7 v. Bureau of State Lottery

Citations

  • 586 N.W.2d 117
  • 231 Mich. App. 356

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that an issue is generally moot when it is impossible for a reviewing court to grant meaningful relief
  • applying doctrine of mootness where “there is no meaningful relief this Court can provide because petitioners can assign their lottery winnings to the same parties under the amended statute”
  • dismissing the appeal as moot
  • dismissing the appeal as moot
  • dismissing the appeal as moot

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gage, Cavanagh, Griffin, Reilly, Bandstra, Markman, Smolensk

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.