· 11/18/1998
B P 7 v. Bureau of State Lottery
Citations
- 586 N.W.2d 117
- 231 Mich. App. 356
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that an issue is generally moot when it is impossible for a reviewing court to grant meaningful relief
- applying doctrine of mootness where “there is no meaningful relief this Court can provide because petitioners can assign their lottery winnings to the same parties under the amended statute”
- dismissing the appeal as moot
- dismissing the appeal as moot
- dismissing the appeal as moot
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gage, Cavanagh, Griffin, Reilly, Bandstra, Markman, Smolensk
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.