Mega Child Care, Inc. v. Texas Department of Protective & Regulatory Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the proponent of the evidence must show the document is what it purports to be as a predicate to admissibility
• noting that the proponent of the evidence must show the document is what it purports to be as a predicate to admissibility
• noting that “[a]n issue involves a mixed question of law and fact when a standard or measure has been fixed by law and the question is whether the person or conduct measures up to that standard”
• “An issue involves a mixed question of law and fact when a standard or measure has been fixed by law and the question is whether the person or conduct measures up to that standard.”
• \An issue involves a mixed question of law and fact when a standard or measure has been fixed by law and the question is whether the person or conduct measures up to that standard.\
• “An issue involves a mixed question of law and fact when a standard or measure has been fixed by law and the question is whether the person or conduct measures up to that standard.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).