In Re Aetna, Inc. Securities Litigation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that puffery includes “statements of subjective analysis or extrapolations, such as opinions, motives and intentions, or general statements of optimism.”
• finding statements “[w]e continue to adhere to a disciplined 16 pricing policy” and “[w]Je have a very strong amount of pricing discipline” to be too vague to be material
• “The safe harbor applies to statements made without actual knowledge that the statement was false or misleading.”
• “Our 2022 results provide a strong foundation. . . structurally higher sales and earnings.”; “Following two consecutive record years, we are very pleased with our 2022 performance . . . strong execution.”
• “[T]he safe harbor applies to statements that are forward-looking as defined by the statute provided that they are (1) identified as such, and accompanied by meaningful cautionary statements; or (2) immaterial; or (3
• statements included, “we continue to adhere to a disciplined pricing policy . . .”; “this pricing discipline has contributed to the stability we have realized . . .”; and “[membership growth] is solid and balanced growth that is representative of our dedication to disciplined pricing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).