S.D. New York· 7/6/2016
Gillis v. QRX Pharma Ltd.
Citations
- 197 F. Supp. 3d 557
- 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87489
- 2016 WL 3685095
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting “implausible” scienter theory because “by its nature, [defendants’] purported scheme could not have continued in perpetuity. Defendants would have known that their efforts [in] feigning likely FDA approval would be revealed, in relatively short order, upon the FDA’s rejection”
- statements about the EDA approval process “[we]re classically forward-looking, as they address[ed] what defendants expected to occur in the future”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Engelmayer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
56 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court· 2007-06-21· cited 6,044×
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court· 1988-03-07· cited 3,007×
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court· 1976-06-14· cited 2,447×
- ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd.Second Circuit· 2007-07-11· cited 2,369×
- Sarah B. Shields, Individually and as Representative of All Others Similarly Situated v. Citytrust Bancorp, Inc., George F. Taylor and Irwin EngelmanSecond Circuit· 1994-06-02· cited 1,243×
- Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. SiracusanoSupreme Court· 2011-03-22· cited 1,056×
- Koch v. Christie's International PLCSecond Circuit· 2012-10-04· cited 967×
- ECA, Local 134 IBEW Joint Pension Trust of Chicago v. JP Morgan Chase Co.Second Circuit· 2009-01-21· cited 674×
- Acito v. IMCERA Group, Inc.Second Circuit· 1995-02-01· cited 639×
- Novak v. KasaksSecond Circuit· 2000-06-21· cited 579×
- Omnicare, Inc. v. Laborers Dist. Council Constr. Industry Pension FundSupreme Court· 2015-03-24· cited 523×
- Rombach v. ChangSecond Circuit· 2004-01-20· cited 494×
- Amidax Trading Group v. S.W.I.F.T. ScrlSecond Circuit· 2011-12-19· cited 487×
- City of Pontiac Policemen's & Firemen's Retirement System v. UBS AGSecond Circuit· 2014-05-06· cited 382×
- In Re: Scholastic Corporation Securities LitigationSecond Circuit· 2001-06-01· cited 332×
- Paul Stevelman, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Alias Research Inc. And Stephen R.B. BinghamSecond Circuit· 1999-04-05· cited 330×
- Cozzarelli v. Inspire Pharmaceuticals Inc.Fourth Circuit· 2008-12-12· cited 328×
- Rolf v. Blyth, Eastman Dillon & Co.Second Circuit· 1978-01-03· cited 315×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.