Skip to main content

In re A.E.

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 4217

Syllabus

Evid.R. 807 child statements in abuse cases Evid. R. 803 other acts evidence hearsay manifest weight sentencing. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing testimony pursuant to the hearsay exception enumerated in Evid.R. 807. We will not consider whether statements are in contravention of Evid.R. 803(4) when the appellant did not make a specific objection at trial and did not reference which statements he was challenging on appeal. The appellant's conviction for gross sexual imposition is not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The appellant was not sentenced to consecutive sentences because the trial court merged his convictions and imposed a single sentence.

Judges: Ryan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.