In re A.E.
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 4217
Syllabus
Evid.R. 807 child statements in abuse cases Evid. R. 803 other acts evidence hearsay manifest weight sentencing. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing testimony pursuant to the hearsay exception enumerated in Evid.R. 807. We will not consider whether statements are in contravention of Evid.R. 803(4) when the appellant did not make a specific objection at trial and did not reference which statements he was challenging on appeal. The appellant's conviction for gross sexual imposition is not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The appellant was not sentenced to consecutive sentences because the trial court merged his convictions and imposed a single sentence.
Judges: Ryan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- Johnson v. Abdullah (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-09-22· cited 666×
- State v. HarrisonOhio Supreme Court· 2009-07-28· cited 66×
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-06-18· cited 39×
- State v. HarrisOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-11-02· cited 34×
- In re A.K.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-01-09· cited 6×
- In re M.P.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-23· cited 5×
- State v. WillettOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-05-16· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.