In re A.K.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• victim's statements about the sexual act using anatomically correct dolls constituted \independent\ proof of the sexual acts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re S.H.W.
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-03-04· cited 14×
• State v. Bennett
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-12-02· cited 12×
• State v. Singleton
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-06-30· cited 5×
• In re A.E.
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-11-22· cited 2×
• State v. C.W.
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-04-15· cited 1×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Thompkins
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
• State v. Jenks
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
• State v. Dehass
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1967-05-31· cited 7,146×
• State v. Goff
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1998-06-17· cited 484×
• State v. Dever
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1992-08-19· cited 262×
• State v. C.J.
  Washington Supreme Court· 2003-02-06· cited 94×
• State v. Said
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1994-12-30· cited 75×
• State v. Silverman
  Ohio Supreme Court· 2009-04-09· cited 29×
• State v. Clark
  Ohio Supreme Court· 2013-10-30· cited 27×
• State v. Beverly
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-04-05· cited 21×
• Ohio v. Clark
  Supreme Court· 2014-10-02· cited 2×
• State v. Cressel
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-08-01· cited 1×