In re A.C.
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 1661
Syllabus
Permanent custody; clear and convincing evidence; manifest weight of the evidence; best interest of the child; R.C. 2151.414; offenses against a child; endangering children; retaliation; incarceration; credibility; custody to maternal grandmother. Trial court's conclusion that the children could not be placed with either parent within a reasonable time and that permanent custody was in the children's best interest was supported by sufficient evidence and by the manifest weight of the evidence. Mother was convicted of child endangerment and retaliation and sentenced to 27 months in prison. Maternal grandmother was not credible in her ability to protect the children. Thus, she should not have custody of the children. The children were too young to express their wishes.
Judges: Forbes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court· 2012-05-22· cited 2,407×
- In re Z.C.Ohio Supreme Court· 2023-12-27· cited 335×
- State v. ShelineOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-02-14· cited 86×
- In re M.J.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-12-12· cited 49×
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-06-18· cited 39×
- In re I.A.-W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-05-26· cited 11×
- In re A.E.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-04-24· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.