In re A.E.
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 1466
Syllabus
Permanent custody; R.C. 2151.414(B)(1)(a); best interest; R.C. 2151.414(D)(1); R.C. 2151.414(D)(2); R.C. 2151.414(E); clear and convincing; manifest weight; legal custody. Affirmed the juvenile court's judgments granting permanent custody of five children to the agency and terminating mother's parental rights. The juvenile court engaged in the proper analysis and made the requisite determinations under R.C. 2151.414(B)(1)(a), (D)(1), (D)(2), and (E), and its judgments were not against the manifest weight of the evidence.
Judges: S. Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court· 2000-06-05· cited 6,943×
- Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court· 2012-05-22· cited 2,407×
- In re CunninghamOhio Supreme Court· 1979-07-18· cited 599×
- In re Z.C.Ohio Supreme Court· 2023-12-27· cited 335×
- In Re B.C.Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-10-16· cited 193×
- In re Y.F.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-11-27· cited 10×
- In re L.V.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-12-19· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.