Skip to main content
· 10/13/1989

Ibrahim v. Ford Motor Co.

Citations

  • 214 Cal. App. 3d 878
  • 263 Cal. Rptr. 64
  • 10 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 117
  • 1989 Cal. App. LEXIS 1272

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that, elsewhere in the Song-Beverly Act, a car dealership is expressly characterized as an “agent” and a “representative” of the manufacturer for the limited purpose of carrying out repairs required under the express warranty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Poche

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.