· 6/25/2001
Oregel v. AMERICAN ISUZU MOTORS, INC.
Citations
- 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 583
- 90 Cal. App. 4th 1094
- 2001 Daily Journal DAR 7643
- 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6260
- 2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 567
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that a plaintiff is required to prove “the vehicle had a nonconformity”
- stating that a plaintiff is required to prove “the vehicle had a nonconformity”
- a consumer does not have to identify, for example, “the source of the leak”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McDONALD
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.