Skip to main content
Sixth Circuit· 2/7/2001

Hyland v. Clinton

Citations

  • 3 F. App'x 478

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “§ 1915(g) does not distinguish between prior in forma pauperis actions and prior actions in which the fee was paid”
  • “[Section] 1915(g) does not distinguish between prior informa pauperis actions and prior actions in which the fee was paid.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cole, Hood, Merritt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Hyland v. Clinton

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.