Ninth Circuit· 8/5/2015
Duane Belanus v. Phil Clark
Citations
- 796 F.3d 1021
- 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 13648
- 2015 WL 4636974
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the imposition of á first strike is a sufficiently concrete harm to give rise to Article III standing
- concluding that a dismissal of a complaint as 15 time-barred was properly “assessed as a strike” under Section 1915(g)
- holding that dismissals on statute of limitations grounds can constitute a strike under § 1915(g) for failure to state a claim if it is clear from the face of the complaint that the claims are time-barred
- concluding that the dismissal of a time-barred complaint “for failure to state a cause of action upon which relief could be granted” was properly “assessed as a strike” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 28 1 Apr. 8, 2021
- concluding that Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) dismissal of time-barred 26 complaint “for failure to state a cause of action upon which relief could be granted” was 27 properly “assessed as a strike” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)
- explaining that a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is subject to the forum state’s statute of limitations for personal injury claims
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fernandez, Rawlinson, Callahan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Washington v. Los Angeles County Sheriff's DepartmentNinth Circuit· 2016-08-12· cited 550×
- Jason Lee Harris v. J. Kenneth MangumNinth Circuit· 2017-07-18· cited 427×
- Thomas Richey v. D. DahneNinth Circuit· 2015-12-08· cited 241×
- Angel Soto v. Unknown SweetmanNinth Circuit· 2018-02-09· cited 236×
- Akassy v. Hardy Akassy v. Simmons Akassy v. Office of the AppellateSecond Circuit· 2018-04-04· cited 67×
- Gary Klein v. City of Beverly HillsNinth Circuit· 2017-08-04· cited 47×
- Kino Bonelli v. Grand Canyon UniversityNinth Circuit· 2022-03-11· cited 41×
- Belanus v. SherlockMontana Supreme Court· 2017-09-19
- William Ellis v. Salt River ProjectNinth Circuit· 2022-01-31
- Kevin Pitts v. State of South CarolinaFourth Circuit· 2023-04-13
- King v. VillegasNinth Circuit· 2025-10-20
Cites
32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court· 1992-06-12· cited 24,791×
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court· 1994-06-24· cited 15,294×
- Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court· 2007-02-21· cited 4,908×
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court· 1989-02-22· cited 4,657×
- Norman Grayson v. Mayview State Hospital Allegheny County Jail Camp Hill Prison United States of America, IntervenorThird Circuit· 2002-06-07· cited 4,438×
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court· 1985-04-17· cited 4,134×
- Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court· 1990-04-24· cited 2,590×
- Wilhelm v. RotmanNinth Circuit· 2012-05-25· cited 2,067×
- Herman Resnick v. Warden Hayes Lt. Ernst Officer Myers (Dho) Counselor Aune Officer WadeNinth Circuit· 2000-05-22· cited 1,510×
- Javiad Akhtar v. J. MesaNinth Circuit· 2012-11-05· cited 1,319×
- Andrews v. KingNinth Circuit· 2005-02-10· cited 1,281×
- Coleman v. TollefsonSupreme Court· 2015-05-18· cited 1,183×
- W. Michael Kimes J. Colette Boykin v. Peter G. Stone, Judge, Superior Court Robert L. Mezzetti, II Henry Mariani Robert MacHadoNinth Circuit· 1996-05-22· cited 884×
- Hardin v. StraubSupreme Court· 1989-05-22· cited 697×
- Jeffrey Taylor v. Delatoore, Deputy Huges, Deputy Unknown Duncan, Sgt. Rogers, Lt. Eriquez, Dr.Ninth Circuit· 2002-02-12· cited 697×
- Geoffrey Benson v. Greg O'BrianSixth Circuit· 1999-06-15· cited 650×
- Raymond Trimble v. City of Santa RosaNinth Circuit· 1995-03-09· cited 498×
- Hamilton v. BrownNinth Circuit· 2011-01-04· cited 282×
- Madero Pouncil v. James TiltonNinth Circuit· 2012-11-21· cited 258×
- Anthony Lewis Whalem/hunt v. Rchard Early, WardenNinth Circuit· 2000-12-07· cited 207×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.