D.C. Circuit· 7/31/2018
Hyatt v. Iancu
Citations
- 332 F. Supp. 3d 83
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Although these cases were not consolidated for trial, because of their complex but nevertheless overlapping records and litigation histories, and common legal issues, the Court is issuing this single opinion concerning the merits in all three matters.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Background, Lamberth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Nippon Shinyaku Co. v. IancuD.C. Circuit· 2019-02-27· cited 11×
- Hyatt v. U.S. Patent & Trademark OfficeD.C. Circuit· 2018-09-28· cited 4×
- Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd. v. KapposDistrict of Columbia· 2019-02-27
- Hyatt v. MatalDistrict of Columbia· 2020-07-23
- Mazer v. D.C. Department of HealthDistrict of Columbia· 2022-03-18
- Hyatt v. VidalDistrict of Columbia· 2024-05-16
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court· 1966-02-21· cited 3,371×
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossFederal Circuit· 2006-02-21· cited 3,273×
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court· 2007-04-30· cited 1,310×
- Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Eli Lilly and Co.Federal Circuit· 2010-03-22· cited 436×
- Vas-Cath Incorporated and Gambro, Inc. v. Sakharam D. Mahurkar, and Quinton Instruments CompanyFederal Circuit· 1991-07-29· cited 365×
- SAS Institute Inc. v. IancuSupreme Court· 2018-04-24· cited 339×
- The Regents of the University of California v. Eli Lilly and CompanyFederal Circuit· 1997-10-24· cited 260×
- Richard Ruiz and Foundation Anchoring Systems, Inc., Plaintiffs-Cross v. A.B. Chance CompanyFederal Circuit· 2000-12-06· cited 187×
- Pharmasterm Therapeutics, Inc. v. Viacell, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2007-07-09· cited 163×
- Symbol Technologies, Inc. v. Opticon, Inc., and Opto ElectronicsFederal Circuit· 1991-09-06· cited 130×
- In Re SchreiberFederal Circuit· 1997-12-17· cited 128×
- LizardTech, Inc. v. Earth Resource Mapping, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2005-10-04· cited 116×
- Beckman Instruments, Inc. v. LKB Produkter ABFederal Circuit· 1989-12-13· cited 109×
- Application of Heinrich Ruschig, Walter Aumuller, Gerhard Korger, Hans Wagner, Josef Scholz and Alfred BanderCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1967-06-22· cited 106×
- Kappos v. HyattSupreme Court· 2012-04-18· cited 103×
- Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Gen-Probe Inc.Federal Circuit· 2002-07-15· cited 94×
- Motorola, Inc. v. Interdigital Technology Corp.Federal Circuit· 1997-07-30· cited 81×
- Abbvie Deutschland GmbH & Co., KG v. Janssen Biotech, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2014-07-01· cited 76×
- Carnegie Mellon University v. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc.Federal Circuit· 2008-09-08· cited 72×
- In Re Lonnie T. Spada and Joseph J. WilczynskiFederal Circuit· 1990-08-10· cited 64×
Other cases named Hyatt v. Iancu
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.