Hyatt v. Hyatt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that agreement to suspend partition action indefinitely constituted an unlawful restraint on alienation
• holding that agreement to suspend partition action indefinitely constituted an unlawful restraint on alienation
• appellant had an absolute right to seek partition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• White v. Village of Homewood
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-12-07· cited 43×
• Lombardo v. DeMarco
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-12-30· cited 39×
• Ralston v. Ralston
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-10-24· cited 26×
• Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v. Zumar
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-03-05· cited 8×
• Kopp v. Kopp
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-02-22· cited 7×
• In re Kasych
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-10-08· cited 3×
• Alexy v. Kennedy House, Inc.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1981-02-04· cited 2×
• Mowers v. Mowers
  Cumberland County Court of Common Pleas· 1994-10-31
• Maris v. Maris
  Delaware County Court of Common Pleas· 1991-07-24

Other cases named Hyatt v. Hyatt

7 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Hyatt v. Hyatt
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-06-10· cited 12×
• Hyatt v. Hyatt
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-04-19· cited 11×
• Hyatt v. Hyatt
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1982-11-08· cited 3×
• Hyatt v. Hyatt
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-02-09· cited 2×
• Hyatt v. Hyatt
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1977-05-24
• Hyatt v. Hyatt
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-04-30
• Hyatt v. Hyatt
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1938-01-20