Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 3/11/2010

Huth v. Haslun

Citations

  • 598 F.3d 70
  • 30 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 705
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 5130
  • 93 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,835
  • 2010 WL 839442

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \We have said that `no legislation may restrict or alter a self-executing constitutional provision.' In re Opinion of the Justices [No. 164]
  • \We have said that `no legislation may restrict or alter a self-executing constitutional provision.' In re Opinion of the Justices [No. 164]
  • finding plaintiff’s complaint was not a matter of public concern where it was “personal in nature and generally related to her own situation”
  • rejecting “a categorical approach that places all speech aimed at redressing personal grievances in the employment context beyond the scope of the First Amendment”
  • involving employee’s complaints raised during daily meetings convened to discuss such matters
  • “To overcome the defense of qualified immunity, a plaintiff must show both (1) the violation of a constitutional right and (2) that the constitutional right was clearly established at the time of the alleged violation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cabranes, Hall, Stein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Huth v. Haslun

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.