Hutch v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “a hearing on a Rule 40 petition is required whenever the allegations in a petition, if taken as true, (1) would change the verdict rendered or (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Murphy v. Curtis
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2010-07-21· cited 26×
• Curtis v. Roob
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2008-07-25· cited 4×
• Akau v. State
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2019-03-05· cited 3×
• Warner v. State.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2022-09-20· cited 1×
• Quach v. State
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2025-12-19

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Preiser v. Rodriguez
  Supreme Court· 1973-05-07· cited 9,100×
• Sandin v. Conner
  Supreme Court· 1995-06-19· cited 9,097×
• Johnson v. Avery
  Supreme Court· 1969-02-24· cited 1,359×
• Dan v. State
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1994-08-29· cited 172×
• United States v. Raymond W. Burrows, Jr.
  Ninth Circuit· 1989-04-18· cited 102×
• Gluth v. Kangas
  Ninth Circuit· 1991-12-23· cited 88×
• Unnamed case
  Sixth Circuit· 1990-10-01· cited 34×
• State v. Allen
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1987-10-28· cited 34×
• Stanley v. State
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1994-09-09· cited 29×
• Turner v. Hawai'i Paroling Authority
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2000-05-09· cited 21×
• Sizemore v. Lee
  W.D. Virginia· 1998-09-17· cited 2×