Turner v. Hawai'i Paroling Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a Rule 40 hearing was required where the appellant “established] a ‘colorable claim’ that the alleged prolonged physical custody resulting from denial of his parole request was illegal”
• holding that a Rule 40 hearing was required where the appellant \establish[ed] a `colorable claim' that the alleged prolonged physical custody resulting from denial of his parole request was illegal\
• explaining that the procedural due process right is a “right not to be deprived of a liberty interest without reasonable notice and a meaningful opportunity to be heard.” (Citation and internal quotation marks omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).