D.C. Circuit· 6/27/1978
Husovsky v. United States
Citations
- 191 U.S. App. D.C. 242
- 590 F.2d 944
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- indicating the urban-rural distinction became “less workable with the growth of suburbs and the increase in traffic through rural countryside”
- duly springs from possession “because the occupant or possessor has supervisory control over the activities conducted upon, and the condition of, the land.”
- liability of United States under FTCA arose from extent of control and supervision exercised by its employees over land involved, not negligence of District employees exercising concurrent responsibilities
- unforeseen change in medical diagnosis that increased the claimant’s predicted life span fit within FTCA’s exceptions
- defendant and landowner agreed to place and maintain defendant’s insignia on the land
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Leventhal, McGowan, Robb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Novak v. Capital Management & Development Corp.D.C. Circuit· 2006-07-07· cited 138×
- Sprecher v. Adamson CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1981-12-07· cited 123×
- Owen Orthmann v. Apple River Campground, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1985-03-19· cited 109×
- Alcaraz v. VeceCalifornia Supreme Court· 1997-01-31· cited 98×
- Antonio Lebron v. United States of America, United States of AmericaFifth Circuit· 2002-01-15· cited 76×
- Tucci v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2008-09-18· cited 40×
- Larry Cannon v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1981-04-01· cited 38×
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-04-03· cited 33×
- Pacheco v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 2000-07-31· cited 32×
- Brown v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1998-08-20· cited 27×
- Walen v. United States of AmericaDistrict of Columbia· 2017-03-31· cited 27×
- Plater v. District of Columbia Department of TransportationDistrict of Columbia· 2008-01-02· cited 25×
- Roy L. Fraysier v. United StatesEleventh Circuit· 1985-07-23· cited 24×
- Contreras v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1997-11-17· cited 23×
- Joseph E. Cole, Cross-Appellee v. United States of America, Cross-AppellantEleventh Circuit· 1988-12-19· cited 20×
- McCormick v. United StatesD. Colorado· 1982-06-02· cited 20×
- Katkish v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-10-18· cited 19×
- Rajabi v. Potomac Electric Power Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-02-01· cited 15×
- Girdler v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia· 2013-02-12· cited 14×
- Michels v. United StatesS.D. Iowa· 1993-03-18· cited 12×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- District of Columbia v. WoodburySupreme Court· 1890-05-19· cited 164×
- Albin v. National Bank of CommerceWashington Supreme Court· 1962-11-01· cited 62×
- Hensley v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-03-20· cited 25×
- Carver v. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'nArizona Supreme Court· 1969-07-02· cited 24×
- Messinger v. StateNew York State Court of Claims· 1944-11-27· cited 22×
- Dudley v. Meadowbrook, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1961-01-11· cited 20×
- Chambers v. WhelenFourth Circuit· 1930-10-24· cited 18×
- Carver v. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1969-01-21· cited 13×
- Turner v. RidleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1958-08-22· cited 11×
- Dewey J. O'Brien v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1960-02-24· cited 6×
- State v. CalhounWashington Supreme Court· 1962-09-20· cited 6×
- Newman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia· 1965-11-04· cited 6×
- Joseph v. District of ColumbiaD.C. Circuit· 1973-03-06· cited 3×
- Jones v. District of Columbia Redevelopment Land AgencyD.C. Circuit· 1974-04-26· cited 2×
- Joseph v. District of ColumbiaD.C. Circuit· 1974-04-16· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.