Plater v. District of Columbia Department of Transportation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing a pro se 12 complaint that was mostly illegible and did not comply with Rule 8
• dismissing § 1983 claim against WMATA because it “is not a ‘person’ under § 1983 and th[us] it retains sovereign immunity against suits brought under § 1983”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).