Antonio Lebron v. United States of America, United States of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• basing a maximum recovery rule finding in a loss-of-consortium case on the \the highest award\ the court could find
• remanding damages award where it was unclear whether the total award “duplicated” some harms
• stating “Low makes clear that new information cannot surmount the bar created by §2675(b
• explaining, “Because the facts of each case are different, prior damages awards are not always controlling; a departure from prior awards is merited ‘if unique facts are present that are not reflected within the controlling caselaw.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).