Hurst v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the state failed to show that officer’s testimony was harmless when officer recounted confidential informant’s description and identification of the defendant
• holding that it was reversible error to admit testimony of officer that confidential informant advised that defendant was selling cocaine at a certain location to explain officer's subsequent actions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Saintilus v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-04-21· cited 10×
• Powell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-08-26· cited 8×
• Martin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-04-11· cited 1×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Goodwin v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1999-12-16· cited 292×
• State v. Baird
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1990-11-29· cited 92×
• Keen v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-09-28· cited 74×
• Conley v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-05-20· cited 60×
• Devoney v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1998-08-18· cited 42×
• Wilding v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1996-05-16· cited 33×
• Schaffer v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-10-18· cited 18×
• Tarrant v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-01-31· cited 15×
• Stribbling v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-02-14· cited 8×