Skip to main content

Hunter v. State

Citations

  • 883 N.E.2d 1161
  • 2008 Ind. LEXIS 263
  • 2008 WL 852949

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding a condition prohibiting the probationer from having “contact” with children and requiring the probationer to report any “incidental contact” with children to his probation officer to be impermissibly vague
  • finding a condition prohibiting the probationer from having “contact” with children and requiring the probationer to report any “incidental contact” with children to his probation officer to be impermissibly vague
  • interpreting probation condition prohibiting “indirect contact . . . via third parties”
  • vagueness challenge to condition of probation which forbade probationer from having “contact” with children

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boehm, Dickson, Rucker, Shepard, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.