Foster v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding a condition prohibiting a probationer from possessing “pornographic or sexually explicit materials” to be impermissibly vague
• finding a Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 73A01-1703-CR-405 | August 30, 2017 Page 8 of 14 condition prohibiting a probationer from possessing “pornographic or sexually explicit materials” to be impermissibly vague
• vagueness challenge to condition prohibiting possession of sexually explicit material when State alleged probationer violated condition by possessing men’s magazines

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Christopher J. Farrell v. Corey Burke and Gregory Freeman, Docket No. 05-0169 Cv
  Second Circuit· 2006-05-31· cited 503×
• State v. Bahl
  Washington Supreme Court· 2008-10-09· cited 425×
• State v. Sansone
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-05-23· cited 65×
• Harris v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2005-10-18· cited 29×
• Hunter v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2008-04-01· cited 26×
• Vicki Jo Clemons v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2017-08-30· cited 12×
• Nicholas Medalen v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2020-01-10
• Thomas S Gray v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2024-05-15

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Grayned v. City of Rockford
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 4,586×
• United States v. Ray Donald Loy
  Third Circuit· 2001-01-04· cited 254×
• United States v. Thomas Luke Guagliardo
  Ninth Circuit· 2002-01-17· cited 116×
• Smith v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2002-11-27· cited 55×
• Fitzgerald v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2004-04-06· cited 24×