Skip to main content
· 7/9/2013

Wayne L. Patton v. State of Indiana

Citations

  • 990 N.E.2d 511
  • 2013 WL 3421932
  • 2013 Ind. App. LEXIS 327

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding probation condition prohibiting defendant from accessing websites frequented by children was not unconstitutionally vague
  • holding defendant failed to demonstrate probation condition was overly broad because he did “not identify a single activity or other conduct that is prohibited by the probation condition but unrelated to [activity meant to be prohibited by the condition]”
  • upholding sex offender’s probation condition that prohibited him from accessing websites frequented by children
  • upholding sex offender's probation condition that prohibited him from accessing websites frequented by children

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker, Mathias

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.