· 7/9/2013
Wayne L. Patton v. State of Indiana
Citations
- 990 N.E.2d 511
- 2013 WL 3421932
- 2013 Ind. App. LEXIS 327
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding probation condition prohibiting defendant from accessing websites frequented by children was not unconstitutionally vague
- holding defendant failed to demonstrate probation condition was overly broad because he did “not identify a single activity or other conduct that is prohibited by the probation condition but unrelated to [activity meant to be prohibited by the condition]”
- upholding sex offender’s probation condition that prohibited him from accessing websites frequented by children
- upholding sex offender's probation condition that prohibited him from accessing websites frequented by children
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baker, Mathias
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.