Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 7/18/2014
Shaw v. State
Citations
- 207 So. 3d 79
- 2014 WL 3559389
- 2014 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 53
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Robbery in the third degree, by its statutory definition . . . involves the use or threat of force. Thus, proof of these convictions, by itself, was sufficient to prove the aggravating circumstances set out in []§ 13A-5-49(2).”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burke, Joiner, Kellum, Welch, Windom, Writing
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SenaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2018-05-25· cited 28×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2017-03-17· cited 13×
- Bohannon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2015-10-23· cited 11×
- Largin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2015-12-18· cited 8×
- Jimmy Davis, Jr. v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of CorrectionsEleventh Circuit· 2024-10-30· cited 5×
- Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2015-05-29· cited 4×
- Creque v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2018-02-09· cited 2×
- State v. SenaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2018-02-14
- Frazier v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2017-09-08
- Derrick Dearman v. State of AlabamaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2023-03-24
- Steven Richard Mulkey v. State of Alabama (Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court: CC-19-980)Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2025-05-02
Cites
290 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court· 1993-06-07· cited 7,022×
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
- United States v. FradySupreme Court· 1982-05-24· cited 5,791×
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court· 1976-06-17· cited 4,773×
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court· 1985-02-20· cited 4,689×
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 2002-06-24· cited 4,683×
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1991-05-28· cited 4,168×
- Darden v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1986-09-03· cited 4,161×
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court· 1985-01-21· cited 3,997×
- Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court· 1974-05-13· cited 3,922×
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 3,552×
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 3,512×
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court· 1970-04-06· cited 3,248×
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court· 1991-04-01· cited 2,917×
- Zant v. StephensSupreme Court· 1983-06-22· cited 2,410×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.