Skip to main content

Hull v. Albrecht

Citations

  • 960 P.2d 634
  • 192 Ariz. 34
  • 271 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 7
  • 1998 Ariz. LEXIS 59

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • striking down state funding provision in part because some districts were “no longer able to employ the historically most important method of securing local funds for school system financing”
  • accepting jurisdiction, in part, \because . . . '[a] prompt resolution is needed'\
  • equal protection analysis applied to claim that Arizona’s school financing scheme violated the General and Uniform Clause of the Arizona Constitution
  • “Financial disparities caused by local control do not run afoul of the state constitution .... [b]ut the general and uniform requirement will not tolerate a state funding mechanism that itself causes disparities between districts.”
  • continued legislative refusal to take action as directed by the state courts to remedy disparities in school financing
  • once legislature has met its responsibility for minimally adequate school system, school district may “seek local sources of revenue, such as property taxation, to surpass the state standards”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zlaket, Jones, Feldman, Martone, McGregor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.