Randolph v. Groscost

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• setting out the test for considering the severability of provisions of voter-approved initiative under Arizona law
• asking whether the remaining provision “can operate independently and is enforceable and workable” without “produc[ing] a result so irrational or absurd as to compel the conclusion that an informed electorate would not have adopted one portion without the other”
• setting forth test for severance of invalid statutory provision
• severing an invalid initiative provision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).